The land where their ancestors lived are put in federal trust
Native American tribes tired of waiting for the US government to honour centuries-old treaties are buying back land where their ancestors lived and putting it in federal trust.
Native Americans say that the purchases will help protect their culture and way of life by preserving burial grounds and areas where sacred rituals are held. They also provide land for farming, timber and other efforts to make the tribes self-sustaining.
Tribes put more than 340,000 hectares – or roughly the equivalent of the state of Rhode Island – into trust from 1998 to 2007, according to information The Associated Press obtained from the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs under the Freedom of Information Act.
Those buying back land include the Winnebago, who have put more than 280 hectares in eastern Nebraska in federal trust in the past five years, and the Pawnee, who have 650 hectares of trust land in Oklahoma. Land held in federal trust is exempt from local and state laws and taxes, but subject to most federal laws.
Three tribes have bought land around Bear Butte in South Dakota’s Black Hills to keep it from developers eager to cater to the bikers who roar into Sturgis every year for a raucous road rally. About 17 tribes from the Dakotas, Nebraska, Wyoming, Montana and Oklahoma still use the mountain for religious ceremonies.
Emily White Hat, a member of South Dakota’s Rosebud Sioux, said that the struggle to protect the land is about ‘preservation of our culture, our way of life and our traditions’.
‘All of it is connected,’ Ms White Hat said. ‘With your land, you have that relationship to the culture.’
Other members of the Rosebud Sioux, such as president Rodney Bordeaux, believe the tribes shouldn’t have to buy the land back because it was illegally taken. But they also recognise that without such purchases, the land won’t be protected.
No one knows how much land the federal government promised Native American tribes in treaties dating to the late 1700s, said Gary Garrison, a spokesman for the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs. The government changed the terms of the treaties over the centuries to make property available to settlers and give rights-of-way to railways and telegraph companies.
President Barack Obama’s administration has proposed spending US$2 billion to buy back and consolidate tribal land broken up in previous generations. The programme would pay individual members for land interests divided among their relatives and return the land to tribal control. But it would not buy land from people outside the tribes.
Today, 562 federally recognised tribes have more than 22.3 million hectares held in trust, according to the bureau. Several states and local governments are fighting efforts to add to that number, saying that the federal government doesn’t have the authority to take land – and tax revenue – from states.
In New York, for example, the state and two counties filed a federal lawsuit in 2008 to block the US Department of Interior from putting about 5,260 hectares into trust for the Oneida Tribe. In September, a judge threw out their claims.
Putting land in trust creates a burden for local governments, because they must still provide services such as sewer and water even though they can’t collect taxes on the property, said Elaine Willman, a member of the Citizens Equal Rights Alliance and administrator for Hobart, a suburb of Green Bay, Wisconsin. Hobart relies mostly on property taxes to pay for police, water and other services, but the village of about 5,900 lost about a third of its land to a trust set up for the state’s Oneida Tribe, Ms Willman said.
So far, Hobart has been able to control spending and avoid cuts in services or raising taxes, Ms Willman said. Village leaders hope taxes on a planned 244-hectare commercial development will eventually help make up for the lost money.
The non-profit White Earth Land Recovery Project has bought back or been gifted hundreds of hectares in north-western Minnesota since it was created in the late 1980s. The White Earth tribe uses the land to harvest rice, farm and produce maple syrup.
Members have hope of one day being self-sustaining again.
Winona LaDuke, who started the White Earth project, said that buying property is expensive, but it’s the quickest and easiest way for tribes to regain control of their land.
Tribal membership has been growing thanks to higher birth rates, longer life spans and more relaxed qualifications for membership, and that has created a greater need for land for housing, community services and economic development.
‘If the tribes were to pursue return of the land in the courts, it would be years before any action could result in more tribal land . . . and the people simply cannot wait,’ said Cris Stainbrook, of the Little Canada, Minnesota-based Indian Land Tenure Foundation.
Some 30 to 40 tribes are making enough money from casinos to buy back land, but they also have to put money into social programmes, education and healthcare for their members, said Robert Miller, a professor at the Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Oregon, who specialises in tribal issues.
‘Tribes just have so many things on their plate,’ he said.
Some tribes, such as the Pawnee, have benefited from gifts of land. Gaylord and Judy Mickelsen donated a storefront in Dannebrog, Nebraska, that had been in Ms Mickelsen’s family for a century.
The couple was retiring to Mesquite, Nevada, in 2007, and Ms Mickelsen wanted to see the building preserved even though the town had seen better days.
The tribe has since set up a shop selling members’ artwork in the building on Main Street.
‘We were hoping the Pawnee could get a toehold here and get a new venture for the village of Dannebrog,’ Mr Mickelsen said.
Source: Business Times, 29 Dec 2009