Property cycles hard to predict

PROPERTY cycles are hard to predict, but the Government will try to avoid boom-bust cycles, said Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam yesterday.

‘We will keep our eyes on the ball and use all the tools at our disposal, but in a calibrated fashion,’ he told about 80 business leaders at a forum to garner feedback for the Economic Strategies Committee. Mr Tharman is heading this committee to look into new ways for Singapore to grow.

The Government will probably not use ‘macro tools’ to manage property cycles, such as changing interest rates or exchange rates, because these rates have many other effects such as on businesses as well, said Mr Tharman in his concluding remarks at the forum.

But there are other options. These include tweaking rules on credit, adjusting land supply and – in extreme situations – amending tax policies, he said.

Two months ago, the Government introduced measures to help cool the property market, including removing the interest absorption payment scheme and significantly increasing land supply.

On Monday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore also highlighted the possibility that additional cooling measures may be needed if there is a renewed surge in property speculation.

‘We do want to manage the property cycle as best we can, prevent boom and bust,’ said Mr Tharman, adding that this is not easy as it is difficult to anticipate Singapore’s property needs four or five years in advance. As for broader economic cycles, Singapore will always be exposed to ups and downs beyond its control, he said.

‘As a city, and a global city at that, we will always be subject to global cycles in specific industries as well as the global macro cycle,’ he said.

The important thing is to achieve good average growth over the cycle, rather than go for a lower growth path to avoid volatility, said Mr Tharman. ‘If you try to dampen all volatility, you usually end up with a lower average as well.’

The unusually strong growth that Singapore enjoyed in 2006 and 2007 helped pull the average growth across the most recent business cycle up to 5 per cent, he added. Without this, wage growth in particular would have been weak.

So Singapore should opt for a path of good growth in incomes, but prepare its businesses and workers well for occasional shocks and respond quickly when they come, said Mr Tharman.

Singapore has ‘not come out too badly’ in the downturn in terms of its ability to buffer companies and employees and to prepare for recovery, he said. But for its next growth phase, the country must undergo a ’step change’. What are needed are higher skills, higher productivity and a higher level of expertise across the board.

Singapore could not engage in strategies of the industrial policy type, that try to plan well ahead of the market. But it moves quickly to identify emerging market trends and work with early adopters to develop clusters of real strength, Mr Tharman said.

One advantage that Singapore can use is its diversity of both people and companies. This will prove a big boon in an age where the Asian consumer is expected to be a key driver of economic growth, Mr Tharman said.

‘In Singapore, you can get a feel of what is happening all around Asia… a sense of what the emerging drivers are.’

Source: Straits Times, 11 Nov 2009